Home   |  View Assessments   |  Reports   |  Login   |  Help         

   


Assessment Results




© 2014 Arturo Munoz (1 of 14 )

AmphibiaWeb species account




IUCN Red List assessment


Conservation Needs Assessment

Telmatobius culeus ,   Titicaca Water Frog
Assessed for:  Bolivia (Plurinational State of)   on: 05 Jun 2014   by: AArk/ASG Assessment Workshop  
Assessment Status: Completed  
Order:   Anura     Family:   Telmatobiidae

IUCN Global Red List:   Critically Endangered (CR)   
IUCN National Red List:   Critically Endangered (CR)   
Distribution:     Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Peru  
Evolutionary Distinctiveness score:   3.298769415 
Recommended Conservation Actions:   Rescue  , In Situ Conservation  , In Situ Research  , Mass Production in Captivity  , Conservation Education  , Biobanking   
Additional Comments:   No tiene una distincion biologica pero sin embargo es la rana completamente acuatica mas grande del mundo y habita lugares muy altos en los Andes,fisiologicamente es una de las pocas especies adaptadas a la altura. Es importante culturalmente ya que en las comunidades locales los consideran como seres espirituales tambien de importancia economica ya que es comercializada en restaurantes aunque ultimamente este factor en disminucion pero una reciente y muy creciente es el uso de la especie para los jugos de ranas en especial en el lado peruano que comienza a ingresar en el territorio boliviano, ultimamente se registro como especie usada para mascota. Si hubo trabajos pero aun falta revisar la taxonomia de esta especie. 

Question #Short NameQuestion TextResponseComments
1 Extinction risk Current IUCN Red List category. [Data obtained from the IUCN Red List.] Unknown
2 Possibly extinct Is there a strong possibility that this species might be extinct in the wild?
3 Phylogenetic significance The taxon’s Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) score, as generated by the ZSL EDGE program. (These data are not editable by Assessors). Unknown
4 Protected habitat Is a population of at least 50% of the individuals of the taxon included within a well-managed or reliably protected area or areas? No / unlikely
5 Habitat for reintroduction, conservation translocation or supplementation Does enough well-managed and reliably protected habitat exist, either within or outside of currently protected areas that is suitable for conservation translocation, including population restoration or conservation intoduction? Yes / probably
6 Previous reintroductions Have reintroduction or translocation attempts been made in the past for this species? No
7 Threat mitigation Are the threats facing the taxon, including any new and emerging threats not considered in the IUCN Red List, potentially reversible? Threats unlikely to be reversed in time to prevent further decline / extinction
8 Over-collection from the wild Is the taxon suffering from collection within its natural range, either for food, for the pet trade or for any other reason, which threatens the species’ continued persistence in the wild? Yes / probably
9 Population recovery Is the known population of this species in the wild large enough to recover naturally, without ex situ intervention if threats are mitigated? Yes / probably
10 Biological distinctiveness Does the taxon exhibit, for example, a distinctive reproductive mode, behaviour, aspect of morphology or physiology, within the Order to which it belongs (e.g. Anura, Passeriformes etc.)? No aspect of biology known to be exceptional
11 Cultural/socio-economic importance Does the taxon have a special human cultural value (e.g. as a national or regional symbol, in a historic context, featuring in traditional stories) or economic value (e.g. food, traditional medicine, tourism) within its natural range or in a wider global context? Yes
12 Scientific importance Is the species vital to current or planned research other than species-specific ecology/biology/conservation? (e.g. human medicine, climate change, environmental pollutants and conservation science), within the Order to which it belongs (e.g. Anura, Passeriformes etc.)? No research dependent on this species
13 Ex situ research Does conserving this species (or closely related species) in situ depend upon research that can be most easily carried out ex situ? Yes Se tiene planes de realizar investigaciones de la relacion de la infeccion de quitridio y radiaciones UV, tambien realizando estudios de marcaje
14 Husbandry analog Do the biological and ecological attributes of this species make it suitable for developing husbandry regimes for more threatened related species? i.e. could this species be used in captivity to help to develop husbandry and breeding protocols which could be used for a similar, but more endangered species at a later stage? No
15 Captive breeding Has this species been successfully bred and/or maintained in captivity? Yes, bred to F1
16 Conservation education/ecotourism potential Is the species especially diurnal, active or colourful, or is there an interesting or unusual aspect of its ecology that make it particularly suitable to be an educational ambassador for conservation of the species in the range country, either in zoos or aquariums or within ecotourism activities? Yes
17 Mandate Is there an existing conservation mandate recommending the ex situ conservation of this taxon? Yes
18 Range State approval If an ex situ initiative was proposed for this species, would it be supported (and approved) by the range State (either within the range State or out-of-country ex situ)? Yes / probably
19 Founder specimens Are sufficient animals of the taxon available or potentially available (from wild or captive sources) to initiate an ex situ program, if one was recommended? Yes / probably
20 Taxonomic status Has a complete taxonomic analysis of the species in the wild been carried out, to fully understand the functional unit you wish to conserve (i.e. have species limits been determined)? No La investigación sobre la validez de las especies debe ser una prioridad.
21 In situ conservation activities Are any in situ conservation actions currently in place for this species? (Only required if a Red List Assessment has not been completed, or if new actions have been implemented since the last Red List Assessment. (Information from the Conservation Actions section of the Red List assessment should be reviewed and considered when answering this question.).
22 In situ research Is additional in situ research required to better understand the species, e.g. distribution, population trends, natural history etc.?
23 Action plans Does an Action Plan for the species already exist, or is one currently being developed?
24 Ex situ conservation activities Is any ex situ research or other ex situ conservation action currently in place for this species? (Information from the Conservation Actions section of the Red List assessment should be reviewed and considered when answering this question.)
25 Husbandry analog required If an ex situ rescue program is recommended for this species, would an analog species be required to develop husbandry protocols first?
26 In situ conservation activities Are additional in situ conservation actions (e.g. habitat restoration and/or protection, control of invasive species, national legislation etc.) required to help conserve this species in the wild?